SUPPLIER-STATEMENT REVIEW · EARLY PROTOTYPE
A credit on the statement.
A trail worth checking.
Compare supplier statements with ledger exports. Bring missing credit references, amount differences, and coverage gaps into one review queue—with the source rows attached.
No sign-up or records needed. Every amount below is fictional.
THE WORKFLOW, IN YOUR HANDS
Follow an exception back to its source.
Select a finding, inspect the evidence, then try a review decision. Changes last only until you reload this page.
Review queue
10 findingsA SMALLER PILE TO INVESTIGATE
From two exports
to a clear next check.
Built for the person who has to explain an exception, not just spot it.
- 01
Compare like with like
References are compared within the same supplier, account, currency, and transaction type. Missing account coverage gets its own flag.
- 02
Keep the evidence in view
Each finding shows its source file and row, the recorded amount, and a suggested next check. Reused references stay outside credit totals.
- 03
Let the finance owner decide
Check allocations and original documents before making changes. A flagged amount remains a candidate until the records support it.
WHERE THE PROTOTYPE STANDS
A focused CSV review.
The local prototype compares structured CSV transaction rows and exports review findings. This demonstration contains a fixed fictional result so you can explore the workflow.
PDF extraction, bank reconciliation, opening and closing balance checks, and accounting-system updates are outside the current prototype. This demo does not accept uploads or connect to your accounts.
HELP SHAPE THE NEXT STEP
Would this help with
your statement backlog?
If someone shared this demo with you, reply to them with these three answers. Please leave out supplier records and account details.
- How do you currently compare supplier statements with your ledger?
- Roughly how many statements wait for review in a typical month?
- What would a useful first review need to show you?